Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plummer Family Helluva Handball Bash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No consensus for deletion and/or merger. Merge discussion can (perhaps sould) take place at article talk page. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Plummer Family Helluva Handball Bash[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is movement handball tournament. It doesn't meet this criteria. In addition to the introduction, there is nothing else. Banhtrung1 (talk) 02:27, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:36, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:36, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:37, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete Fairly minor event which has a strong and growing web presence. I think it is too young as a sporting event to pass WP:GNG. scope_creep (talk) 19.11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Keep - Satisfies General Notability Guideline based on sources showing in the footnotes. I thought from the title this was gonna be some throwaway piece about a family handball party. It isn't. Carrite (talk) 20:57, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Carrite that this seems to meet GNG. Instead of deletion, perhaps a merger to Jake Plummer should be considered? Also, per this article they seem to have dropped the "Plummer Family" part of the title. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:50, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 02:21, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Jake Plummer. buff bills 7701 18:52, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.